|
1811 | Backend/Core | Feature Request | Low | Google Docs/Dropbox Integration | New | |
| 2.0 | | 17.01.2013 | 13.03.2015 |
Task Description
On a project or ticket basis should be able to hook in and possibly also share permissions
|
|
1861 | Backend/Core | Bug Report | Medium | Login-Page should redirect after login to the page, the... | Confirmed | |
| 1.1 devel | 1 | 12.04.2013 | 09.07.2018 |
Task Description
When some url to a bug is redirected to the login page, because the user does not have the right to see the bug without login, the user should be redirected after the login to the url he wanted to see.
Maybe redirect to /login/?next=/task/X and put the next-url in a hidden field in the login-form, so flyspray can redirect to the correct page after login. Even preserving anchor-urls (#comment-YYYY) would be cool, but i guess this needs Javascript to work.
|
|
1967 | User Interface | Bug Report | Low | Keep browser scroll position when sorting task list | New | |
| 1.1 devel | | 12.03.2015 | 19.09.2015 |
Task Description
When I scroll down the page to see more of the task list and then click on one of the column headings to sot by this heading, the answer page doesn't scroll down to the table.
I think there are 2 technical solutions for that:
1. set an name/id a-anchor on top of the table and on each column heading link add for example '#tasklist'.
2. add a js-sorter with complete extra search and sort ajax-backend with e.g. libs from http://datatables.net/ This requires aleso writing a server side handler for taking the ajax requests (respecting user permissions!) and is only usable if js in enabled in browser. So this second solution can only be a luxury comfort function.
|
|
1972 | User Interface | Feature Request | Low | Advanced search form - ideas for faster/better usabilit... | New | |
| 1.1 devel | | 12.03.2015 | 18.03.2019 |
Task Description
This task can maybe splitted into separate sub tasks.
Task properties
Current situation
Ideas
Multi select option styling
Some (not all, intentional!) browsers support CSS styling of option tags. For these who support it I think option styling is a good usability enhancement:
severity: We use background colors for styling in task list, so we should use the same colors for the select.
priority: maybe, but must be good distinguishable from severity styling. maybe not background, but maybe icons,borders,lines?
task type: This styling would be related to an other task, where I suggest icons/font icons for bugs, feature requests and TODO (see also themes/CleanFS/custom_example.css)
progress: maybe use the green %-bars as background styling
status: If for some status types very intuitive icons exists, they could be used for the options too.
due version: no idea yet, no option styling
reported version: no idea yet, no option styling
Update: CSS of option tags working in multi selects:
Firefox 64: yes
Safari 12: no
Google Chrome 71: no
So only Firefox. The intended styling could be also achieved by Javascript that renders alternative select boxes based on reading the original select boxes and their option attributes and show the user CSS styled div-tag or li-tag based constructs which do not have such restrictions.
Custom fields
challenge/doom level - doom faces: from easy/normal to bloody/angry face
os: logos like tux for linux, devil for bsd, window for ms, apple icon, osX icon, android, apple, iphone/smartphone icon, ipad/tablet icon, ..
But Consider: Different project may need different custom fields. Your gardening project may need no OS version selector.
Make some intelligent positioning and sizing dependent on the count of options of the selects.
|
|
2031 | User Interface | TODO | Low | Rendering overdue | Planned | |
| 1.1 devel | | 12.08.2015 | 14.08.2015 |
Task Description
One of my task has 8.9166666666667 days left. This is very very very very accurate !
A rounding would look better !
Running Alpha2 now, Cannot use this on 'reported version' here on this site
Edit: Rounding is adhoc fixed on 2015-06-21 in dev in template file, but code should IMHO be centralized, not template, see comments
|
|
2081 | User Interface | Bug Report | Low | UI for adding comment while editing task doesn't use HT... | Confirmed | |
| | | 29.10.2015 | 06.11.2015 |
Task Description
While editing an existing task, there’s a “+” button you can click to add a comment as part of the edit. Unfortunately this is just a plaintext box instead of the HTML editor used everywhere else, so it’s impossible to get proper line/paragraph breaks if a comment is entered with this UI.
This problem makes it necessary to edit a task and add a comment as two separate steps, whereas in 0.9.9.6 it was possible to do them together in one step.
Note that this is the case with syntax_plugin=”none”. I don’t know if it’s also a problem when using other values for that setting.
|
|
2087 | Backend/Core | Information | High | See no Editor in Add New Task | Unconfirmed | |
| | 1 | 04.11.2015 | 05.11.2015 |
Task Description
Hi,
I can’t see the Editor when I make new task. Also when I editing a exciting task.
See nothing to put any HTML code in it. Can you help me!?
I use this version: Flyspray 0.9.9.7
|
|
2094 | Email | Bug Report | High | After Upgrade All Users Receive Notifications for All T... | Unconfirmed | |
| | 1 | 06.01.2016 | 13.01.2016 |
Task Description
I upgraded from 0.9.9 to 1.0-beta2 a few hours ago. I received an error about oauth during the upgrade (didn’t think to take a screenshot). In any case, the upgrade otherwise seemed to go smoothly. When I subsequently closed a few tasks people who weren’t assigned to receive notifications for those tasks, even old consultants whose account I had disabled years ago, received the email notification. I also received lots of bounced emails from accounts whose email addresses were no longer existant.
Has anyone else experienced this? I’ve gone into the database and null’d out the email addresses of old accounts to prevent further spam. Not only did it notify everyone who had an account (active or disabled) but it put their email address in the To: field for all to see.
|
|
2101 | Backend/Core | Bug Report | Low | Mobile view GUI bug | Confirmed | |
| | | 18.02.2016 | 24.02.2016 |
Task Description
As you can see on screenshot attachment the GUI on mobile view is not OK.
I marked with red field what need to be fixed.
Phone used: Samsung Note 4.
|
|
2122 | Backend/Core | Bug Report | Medium | open_basedir restrictions for FS_CACHE_DIR not respecte... | Suspended | |
| | | 22.04.2016 | 16.08.2016 |
Task Description
Edit by peterdd: renamed task summary
Affected versions: at least Flyspray 0.9.9(.7/*?) up to Flyspray 1.0 RC1
Original report: Title ‘Problem regarding 0.9.7 (1.0) to 1.0 RC-1 update’
I tried to update BT from modified version (database in original state) 0.9.7 to 1.0 RC-1 but I got strange error.
PHP is 5.6.
I try to use: Precompiled with 3rd party libs for PHP5.6
and was doing as was written on upgrade procedure.
Strange is that “D:\SShopBT\includes\class.flyspray.php” there are errors regarding writtable path... Because the path is correct and all other Joomla and Wordpress web sites are working correctly..
After upgrade web site do not work att all. Login not working - just get error. So I must reverse (use backup) database and files.
Server is Windows Server and IIS (Internet Information Services)..
Complete error was (also seen in screenshot):
Warning: is_writable(): open_basedir restriction in effect. File(C:\PHP-temp) is not within the allowed path(s): (D:\) in D:\SShopBT\includes\class.flyspray.php on line 1162
Warning: is_writable(): open_basedir restriction in effect. File(C:\PHP-temp) is not within the allowed path(s): (D:\) in D:\SShopBT\includes\class.flyspray.php on line 1164
Warning: is_dir(): open_basedir restriction in effect. File(C:\Windows\TEMP\e865fa2fdfc11dbb32cc6262d247e766) is not within the allowed path(s): (D:\) in D:\SShopBT\includes\constants.inc.php on line 82
Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at D:\SShopBT\includes\class.flyspray.php:1162) in D:\SShopBT\header.php on line 14
Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at D:\SShopBT\includes\class.flyspray.php:1162) in D:\SShopBT\header.php on line 15
Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at D:\SShopBT\includes\class.flyspray.php:1162) in D:\SShopBT\header.php on line 16
Warning: session_start(): Cannot send session cookie - headers already sent by (output started at D:\SShopBT\includes\class.flyspray.php:1162) in D:\SShopBT\includes\class.flyspray.php on line 893
Warning: session_start(): Cannot send session cache limiter - headers already sent (output started at D:\SShopBT\includes\class.flyspray.php:1162) in D:\SShopBT\includes\class.flyspray.php on line 893
Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at D:\SShopBT\includes\class.flyspray.php:1162) in D:\SShopBT\index.php on line 93
Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at D:\SShopBT\includes\class.flyspray.php:1162) in D:\SShopBT\index.php on line 94 Headers are already sent, this should not have happened. Please inform Flyspray developers.
|
|
2214 | Backend/Core | Information | Low | Changing status of task automatically | Unconfirmed | |
| | | 17.10.2016 | 06.11.2016 |
Task Description
Hello again,
I was wondering (again ) if the following scenario is possible for this bug tracking solution:
Our company uses this bug tracker mainly for helpdesk issues. However, our main users (except IT department) don’t seem to easily understand how to change the status of a ticket, they aren’t interested in doing that also.
So I would like to know if there is a way that we can develop some automatisation in changing the status automatically after customer replies to a message.
Let’s see the following scenario:
user A posts a new task
user B assigns himself (or other) to that specific task - the status automatically is changed to Assigned
user B replies to task by adding a comment - as a result of adding the new comment the task status should change automatically to Waiting for customer - without the need that user B to change the status
user A checks the comment from user B and decides to comment back to him. After pressing the Add comment button, the status should change automatically to Waiting for assignee
If the task is needed to have another status, the users can change them manually, but the automated part should be the waiting for customer and assignee.
On a basic algorithm it shouldn’t be hard (if user is logged in and is task owner, then after comment, task detail - status changing to id 4-5 from task-statuses table on mysql; if user is logged in and assigned to task, after adding comment change status 4-5 from task-statuses table).
I saw this thing on an otrs platform and it is quite ok for a simple user like ours.
Is there any way that we can personalise the flyspray in this way?
If yes, please give us an elaborate answer with what I should do for this to work.
Thanks in advance.
|
|
2330 | Backend/Core | Bug Report | Low | PHP Notice: Undefined offset: 0 in scripts/index.php o... | Unconfirmed | |
| | | 23.01.2017 | 30.01.2017 |
Task Description
Pretty minor, but seems to show up regularly enough in our logs. The line in question:
$outfile = str_replace(' ', '_', $tasks[0]['project_title']).'_'.date("Y-m-d").'.csv';
|
|
2337 | Documentation | Information | Low | Flyspray Themes | New | |
| | | 02.02.2017 | 16.02.2017 |
Task Description
Flyspray 1.0 includes 1 default theme CleanFS. That decision was made to reduce maintainance effort and the old blue theme was dropped. Also the CleanFS contains UI-logic implemented in HTML/ CSS and tries to be usable even for the people who turned off javascript in their web browsers for security reasons. (and reduces spam on many other websites too without an adblocker)
Advantages of CleanFS instead running your own
‘Subtheme’ can be a compromise: Theme CleanFS is always uptodate in sync with Flyspray. Subthemer only needs to check changes required for own subtheme .tpl files.
I do not want complete stop people from writing their whole new template, it allows new ideas implemented or alternative usability. For them, it is probably better to create a Github project for that theme.
This is just raw info from me and can be discussed. Something should be finally written on https://www.flyspray.org in the documentation area.
|
|
2520 | Notifications | Feature Request | Low | Send a notification for a new task in slack integration... | Unconfirmed | |
| | | 24.10.2018 | 30.03.2020 |
Task Description
Hi, i made a way to integrate slack in flyspray using webhooks.. i not added to git.. if some can add for me it’s ok.
The process is simple.. maybe in the front the team can add a field for add the webhook for each action could be better.. in this moment the webhook is triggered only for newtask using the log method.. but you can simply add some “if” for each “type” of log.
Process:
1. Create a new field in the table flyspray_users named “slack”, and add the user slack for each user. 2. Edit the file /includes/class.flyspray.php , go to the function “logEvent” and change it by this:
public static function logEvent($task_id, $type, $newvalue = '', $oldvalue = '', $field = '', $time = null)
{
global $db, $user;
// This function creates entries in the history table. These are the event types:
// 0: Fields changed in a task
// 1: New task created
// 2: Task closed
// 3: Task edited (for backwards compatibility with events prior to the history system)
// 4: Comment added
// 5: Comment edited
// 6: Comment deleted
// 7: Attachment added
// 8: Attachment deleted
// 9: User added to notification list
// 10: User removed from notification list
// 11: Related task added to this task
// 12: Related task removed from this task
// 13: Task re-opened
// 14: Task assigned to user / re-assigned to different user / Unassigned
// 15: This task was added to another task's related list
// 16: This task was removed from another task's related list
// 17: Reminder added
// 18: Reminder deleted
// 19: User took ownership
// 20: Closure request made
// 21: Re-opening request made
// 22: Adding a new dependency
// 23: This task added as a dependency of another task
// 24: Removing a dependency
// 25: This task removed from another task's dependency list
// 26: Task was made private
// 27: Task was made public
// 28: PM request denied
// 29: User added to the list of assignees
// 30: New user registration
// 31: User deletion
// 32: Add new subtask
// 33: Remove Subtask
// 34: Add new parent
// 35: Remove parent
$query_params = array(intval($task_id), intval($user->id),
((!is_numeric($time)) ? time() : $time),
$type, $field, $oldvalue, $newvalue);
// CREATE A NOTIFICATION IN SLACK WHEN A NEW TASK IS CREATED ONLY TO THE USER SELECTED
if ($type == 14) {
$usuarios = $db->query("SELECT DISTINCT a.slack, c.item_summary, d.project_title
FROM {users} a
JOIN {assigned} b on b.user_id = a.user_id
JOIN {tasks} c on c.task_id = b.task_id
JOIN {projects} d on d.project_id = c.project_id
WHERE b.task_id = ?
and a.slack <> '-'", array(intval($task_id)));
$slackUsers = $db->fetchAllArray($usuarios);
foreach ($slackUsers as $users) {
// GET THE USERS FOR IN THE SLACK TO SEND THE NOTIFICATION.
$data = array(
'text' => "New task: Project: " . $users['project_title'] . " | summary: " . $users['item_summary'] . " | taskId:" . $task_id ,
'username' => "bott inslack",
'link_names' => "1",
'channel' => "@" . $users['slack'],
'icon_emoji' => ":panda_face:"
);
$options = array(
'http' => array(
'header' => 'Content-type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded\r\n',
'method' => 'POST',
'content' => json_encode($data)
)
);
// DEFINE SLACK WEBHOOK
$context = stream_context_create($options);
$result = file_get_contents("https://hooks.slack.com/services/xxxxxxxxx", false, $context);
}
}
if($db->query('INSERT INTO {history} (task_id, user_id, event_date, event_type, field_changed,
old_value, new_value) VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?)', $query_params)) {
return true;
}
return false;
} |
|
2522 | Backend/Core | Feature Request | Low | email vs username login issues | Researching | |
| | | 31.10.2018 | 02.11.2018 |
Task Description
So, I’ve been away from Flyspray for more than a few years. When I tried to login to the Flyspray here, I was unable to login, because I don’t remember my username, and I was unable to retrieve my username, because there’s no function for that. I was *also* unable to re-register the same email address. SO, having an account system that requires both unique usernames and unique email addresses, but has no way of retrieving one from the other, doesn’t work out so well.
Suggestion: either use email as username, or add a function to retrieve username (perhaps along with password retrieval . . password retrieval would then have to take username -or- email, probably)
|
|
2643 | Backend/Core | Information | Low | Unable to delete a wrong Task | Unconfirmed | |
| | | 07.07.2021 | 08.07.2021 |
Task Description
Today I received a Spam into my Flyspray, I wanted to ban the user and to delete the task, to my surprise I didn’t see an option to -delete- a created task, so I don’t want to keep this spammy content into my DB or even worse, publically viewable to other users / or google (which will impact in seo and also make their spamming successful forever), I just wanted to simply remove the task entirely from the DB
So my only option was to restore the 2-days before database backup in order to remove it, then I upgraded to the last git checkout but I didn’t see that option existing
I think flyspray needs to have that option included
Thank you
|
|
1236 | User Interface | Feature Request | Low | Mark Issue As Verified or Unverifiable | Unconfirmed | |
| | 4 | 09.04.2007 | 18.07.2016 |
Task Description
Currently, the Vote functionality provides users a way to say "this issue is important to me". In addition to that functionality, it would be great for users to have a "Verify" ability on open issues; it would provide users a way to say "yes, this happens to me as well".
A "Verified" label would fit nicely right under "Votes", to the right of the label would be "Yes | No", each option being a link. After clicking Yes or No, or if unable to specify (lack of permissions), the text would display "Yes - # | No - # (% verification)" where '%' is the result of ((Yes/(Yes+No))*100).
This feature should not show up on all issues, though. It does not make sense to "verify" a feature request or todo item, for example. When defining task types, the administrator would specify if a type was "Verifiable" by checking a box in a column next to "Show".
If implemented, two great, mini extra features would be:
The ability for the administrator to set the number of "Yes" verifications an issue would need before it was elevated to the next priority, severity, or both (specified by the administrator).
The ability for the administrator to set the number of "No" verifications an issue would need before it was lowered to the previous priority, severity, or both (specified by the administrator).
Both settings should have an option to be incremental (priority / status increased every x verifications) or not (increases once, no matter how many verifications are received); an "Incremental" checkbox would do nicely. Also, a little "Enabled" checkbox next to both settings would be clearer than having zero act as the disable mechanism.
As with voting, a permission should exist to enable or disable this option for a user group. For larger projects, moderators tasked with verifying bugs could be given the permission whereas smaller projects may leave verifications up to the community.
Lastly, a way to send a notification once the number of "Yes" verifications reached a certain value would also be a great addition.
|
|
1720 | Backend/Core | Feature Request | Low | Better Access Control Lists and User / Group Management | Planned | |
| 1.1 devel | | 01.05.2012 | 20.03.2015 |
Task Description
We need to have a better way to do user rights, group rights and manage users.
Here is what I am thinking, global administration can go to a ACL tab. Click on it and you have a simple way to add a new user / group. Two tabs on top are User Rights and Group Rights. These are global so each project will inherit the global setting for user / group.
Clicking on User Rights tab will lists users with a table to grant user rights. Specific to that user, it would be the same for group rights tab.
You can also search by a user name. This will make things faster to find that specific user.
|
|
1812 | Backend/Core | Feature Request | Low | Multiple email addresses | Planned | |
| 1.1 devel | | 17.01.2013 | 30.12.2015 |
Task Description
An account should be able to have multiple email addresses associated with it. For example, my primary email might be jordan@thevelozgroup.com, but I should also be able to log in via jordanmendler@gmail.com or other addresses I add.
|
|
1820 | Backend/Core | Feature Request | Low | Merge comments, history, and details | New | |
| 2.0 | | 17.01.2013 | 25.05.2016 |
Task Description
Should be more of a link thread of activity rather than segmented
|
|
1847 | User Interface | Feature Request | Low | Make default theme responsive | Planned | |
| 1.1 devel | | 14.03.2013 | 16.10.2015 |
Task Description
I think it is time to think about an theme optimizied for mobile Devices.
We will not maintain several themes. We will review the current CleanFS theme to make it responsible instead.
|
|
1876 | Backend/Core | Feature Request | Low | Add wiki page tab | Planned | |
| 2.0 | 1 | 26.09.2013 | 06.03.2015 |
Task Description
It will quite useful to have wiki page for project.
|
|
1919 | Backend/Core | Bug Report | Low | AJAX Quick-Edit on category and task pages | Planned | |
| 1.1 devel | 1 | 09.07.2014 | 07.12.2015 |
Task Description
Ability to click field to edit ticket
TODO: return handler if request ok or fail.
TODO: also clicks on label should trigger show form.
Maybe the whole “click to active for editing this field” to one click too much. So if the user has the rights to edit the value the form input or action button should be shown when viewing a task. All other people just see the value if they have the right to view the value.
|
|
1956 | Backend/Core | TODO | Low | Dates | Confirmed | |
| 1.1 devel | | 07.03.2015 | 09.03.2015 |
Task Description
Upon my implementation for an easier date selector, I think we should rework it as follow:
|
|
1969 | User Interface | Feature Request | Low | search form with Advanced search toggle layout | New | |
| 1.1 devel | | 12.03.2015 | 19.09.2015 |
Task Description
I think the button advanced search button should not be placed right beside seach input field as full button.
Maybe a small down arrow under the simple search form with a horizontal line and a title tag as tooltip.
Any comments?
|
|
1975 | Backend/Core | Feature Request | Low | Batch processing of tasks in tasklist | Planned | |
| 1.1 devel | 1 | 15.03.2015 | 13.12.2016 | |
|
1982 | Backend/Core | Bug Report | Low | double entries in assignees list | New | |
| 1.1 devel | | 20.03.2015 | 11.02.2016 | |
|
1988 | Installer and Upgrader | Bug Report | Medium | Password Field for Admin | Unconfirmed | |
| | | 02.04.2015 | 12.05.2015 | |
|
2042 | Backend/Core | Bug Report | Medium | function absoluteURI not using basedir and force_basedi... | Unconfirmed | |
| | 1 | 04.09.2015 | 01.10.2015 | |
|
2062 | User Interface | TODO | Low | review do=admin&area=editallusers | New | |
| | | 29.09.2015 | 15.04.2020 | |
|
2074 | User Interface | Bug Report | Medium | Opening tasks from tasklist | New | |
| 1.0 | | 18.10.2015 | 18.07.2016 | |
|
2096 | Backend/Core | Feature Request | Very Low | Add an option to force https | Maybe | |
| | | 16.01.2016 | 17.01.2016 | |
|
2108 | User Interface | Feature Request | Medium | Support local language when install Flyspray | Confirmed | |
| | 1 | 03.03.2016 | 17.04.2021 | |
|
2121 | Backend/Core | Bug Report | Medium | 'my assigned tasks' uses like %?% search instead of use... | Confirmed | |
| 1.0 | | 19.04.2016 | 03.02.2018 | |
|
2134 | Backend/Core | Bug Report | High | Cannot assign a task to other project | Planned | |
| | 2 | 07.06.2016 | 17.02.2019 | |
|
2136 | User Interface | Bug Report | Medium | After updating user properties as admin - return to wro... | Confirmed | |
| | | 08.06.2016 | 23.07.2016 | |
|
2202 | Installer and Upgrader | Bug Report | High | Unable to upgrade | Unconfirmed | |
| | | 10.09.2016 | 11.10.2016 | |
|
2222 | Greek | Information | Very Low | Greek translation issues | Unconfirmed | |
| | | 24.10.2016 | 24.10.2016 | |
|
2225 | Greek | Bug Report | Very Low | Greek uses slash for dates | Confirmed | |
| | | 24.10.2016 | 22.11.2016 | |
|
2309 | User Interface | Bug Report | Low | PHP noticed displayed on default "All Projects" page. | Unconfirmed | |
| | | 02.11.2016 | 26.11.2016 | |
|
2318 | Installer and Upgrader | Bug Report | Low | syntax_plugin required when selected ckeditor in Setup | Requires testing | |
| | | 23.11.2016 | 07.12.2016 | |
|
2325 | User Interface | Feature Request | Low | big image attachments: fit to browser window width in L... | New | |
| | | 10.01.2017 | 11.01.2017 | |
|
2327 | Backend/Core | Feature Request | Low | visibility-option for private tasks | Unconfirmed | |
| | | 15.01.2017 | 17.01.2017 | |
|
2333 | Backend/Core | Information | Low | Set Default View on Login? | Unconfirmed | |
| | | 26.01.2017 | 27.01.2017 | |
|
2545 | User Interface | Information | Low | Can't delete system wide 'Task Statuses' | Unconfirmed | |
| | | 20.04.2019 | 05.05.2019 | |
|
2551 | Authentication | Information | Low | LDAP/AD integration | Unconfirmed | |
| | | 15.05.2019 | 04.09.2019 | |
|
2552 | Email | Bug Report | High | Email TLS error (was 'Mail Adress encryption') | Unconfirmed | |
| | | 30.05.2019 | 08.04.2020 | |
|
2582 | Backend/Core | Information | Low | How to reach internal windows share (was: Internal URL) | Unconfirmed | |
| | | 04.11.2019 | 05.11.2019 | |
|
1539 | Backend/Core | Feature Request | Low | Sitemap.xml Generation | Unconfirmed | |
| 2.1 | 1 | 12.01.2009 | 11.03.2015 | |
|
1612 | Backend/Core | Feature Request | Low | Allow Comments by anonymous Users | Unconfirmed | |
| 2.0 | 1 | 20.10.2009 | 17.01.2013 | |