|
2097 | User Interface | Bug Report | Medium | Url incorrect for view attachement | Unconfirmed | |
| | 1 | 16.01.2016 | 02.03.2016 |
Task Description
I’m using URL rewriting…
If I click on the link, the picture doesn’t appear.
https://flyspray.xxx.fr/task/27?getfile=8
It’s ok in task history. The right URL is
https://flyspray.xxx.fr/?getfile=8
.
|
|
1973 | Backend/Core | TODO | Low | url rewrite | Planned | |
| 1.1 devel | | 14.03.2015 | 11.02.2016 |
Task Description
Well, it needs a cleanup, per example:
fixed now http://127.0.0.1/flyspray/task/3?project=1
That should be something like:
The actual one is actually half a rewrite and half a GET version
|
|
2059 | Backend/Core | Feature Request | Low | usage of github automated/webhook notifications | New | |
| | | 24.09.2015 | 24.09.2015 |
Task Description
We have no API yet for Flyspray.
But someone could write a simple php-file that can be called by a github.com auto notification, whenever:
Github.com provides the configuration of such notification for a possible target like
https://bugs.flyspray.org/api/github.php
or
https://bugs.flyspray.org/api/github.php?project=1
in the settings of a project.
What the file needs:
import some of the existing Flyspray classes from includes/
config or load the secrets that are provided by github.com in the setup for the automatic notification
check that secrets and more for authentication and authorization of requests coming from github.com
-
take actions on the results of that message parsing like making adding comment or modifying a task status
|
|
2430 | Backend/Core | Feature Request | Low | User dependency on project | Unconfirmed | |
| | | 16.03.2017 | 20.03.2017 |
Task Description
So, there would be great option if we can set permission to users to see and post only in specific opened projects in bug tracker.
Idea is, that user has all right to all projects, but in some cases we want that user can see only projects which is allowed and also to publish new tasks to only allowed projects.
In that case tasks overiew is locked and user must be logged in to see opened tasks.
|
|
1834 | Backend/Core | Feature Request | Low | user profile page | Maybe | |
| 2.0 | | 25.02.2013 | 07.04.2021 |
Task Description
Should have a page that is a users profile page. so clicking in that users name on a ticket takes you there and you can see what bugs are assigned to them, what they have commented on, and other info about them and about their activity.
|
|
2598 | User Interface | Bug Report | Low | user registration in admin area: "username taken" but t... | Assigned | |
peterdd | 1.0 | | 20.03.2020 | 14.04.2021 |
Task Description
Trying to add a new user having the same email address as an another user in the do=admin&area=newuser section results in
“That username is already taken. You will need to choose another one.”
instead of
“Email address has already been taken”
(I’ve stumbled on this issue because I have an older disabled user with the same email address)
|
|
2479 | Backend/Core | Information | Low | User table seems really complex | Unconfirmed | |
| | | 10.08.2018 | 10.08.2018 |
Task Description
why not store all the user preferences in preferences or user_prefernces? Then users can just be simple username, email, password?
|
|
1753 | Backend/Core | Feature Request | Medium | Usergroup Restriction: Only View Summary | Confirmed | |
| 1.1 devel | 2 | 20.06.2012 | 27.06.2016 |
Task Description
I was really impressed with Flyspray and about to use it as our bug tracker, but then I discovered quite a big problem. You can't restrict users from seeing full task details.
I would really love the ability to let them only see the summary. My reason being is that I'm needing a bug tracker for my game, and bugs reported can be easily abused, and will be abused, if people can just read bug reports and see how to replicate them.
The reason I don't like just unchecking the "View Tasks" option, is because they wont be able to see if there is already a task about the bug, so we would just get flooded with duplicate reports on the same bugs.
|
|
2453 | Backend/Core | Bug Report | Medium | validate category before storing a new task | New | |
| 1.0 | | 14.12.2017 | 14.12.2017 |
Task Description
Currently the category_id is not checked if the value is legal for the project when a new task is created.
If invalid category_id is sent, deny creating task and show error message and show filled form again.
If no category_id is sent (or empty string) and category select is enabled:
or
implement feature request FS#2451 and show that user should select a category.
|
|
2327 | Backend/Core | Feature Request | Low | visibility-option for private tasks | Unconfirmed | |
| | | 15.01.2017 | 17.01.2017 |
Task Description
We have some private Tasks in our FS-bugtracker to hide them from normal reporters. But we also have some external beta-testers in a betatesters-group and they should be able to see (and check) the private tasks without giving them a project manager status. So it would be good, if there is a switch in the group option to give specific groups the right to see private tasks.
|
|
1977 | Backend/Core | Bug Report | Low | Weird URL after closing task with reference | Unconfirmed | |
| | | 15.03.2015 | 18.03.2015 |
Task Description
On Mac OS Safari:
I just closed a task and wrote the following into the comment for closing:
"See also F.S.#.14" (of course without the points). When I then click the link in the comment box (below the task details) I'm redirected to: "http:/flyspray.stefan-herz%0Aog.tld/index.php?do=details&task_id=%0A14". No matter if #14 is closed or not. It worked with Firefox.
Any suggestions?
|
|
1222 | Backend/Core | Feature Request | Medium | Workflow engine / Role-based State Transition Rules Eng... | Unconfirmed | |
| | 7 | 25.03.2007 | 05.05.2019 |
Task Description
I have been working with Eventum (http://www.mysql.org/downloads/other/eventum/) for quite sometime now and in contrast, I like Flyspray for its simplicity and practicality. But one thing I badly miss (and something that Eventum scores high) is a Workflow Engine. If not a sophisticated W.E., I (as an Admin / Manager) should be able define role-based state transition rules of the tasks reported in a particular project. For example, I should be able to implement the following scenario:
For a “Developer”, the subsequent tasks from various states. Likewise for other roles
“Developer” should not be able close out the bug reports. He/she can only flag them as implemented. The “Reporter” of the bugs or the “Manager” alone should be able to close out issues
..
.. it will go on like that 
This feature, in my opinion, is very crucial for corporate organizations to give a serious consideration to Flyspray.
|
|
2215 | Text Rendering | Bug Report | Low | wrong output of Geshi syntax highlighting for xml code | New | |
| | | 17.10.2016 | 31.12.2017 |
Task Description
Geshi 1.0.8.17 from https://github.com/easybook/geshi is quite slow at the current integration of Flyspray v1.0-rc3 on the first run. (But any further read uses the cache.)
But it produces garbled output for xml code highlighting:
Example without xml, just format as preformatted code:
<table>blabla</table>
Or as php syntax highlighting (even if it doesn’t contain a real php-tag ):
<table>blabla</table>
Example with xml choosen as language:
blabla
The table tag is stripped away instead of converting the tag for output inside code/pre tags (by converting the < and > chars). Maybe just a configuration issue?
|
|
1856 | Backend/Core | Bug Report | Medium | Wrong timezones | Researching | |
| | 3 | 27.03.2013 | 06.03.2015 |
Task Description
Hello, when selecting timezone in user profile, it only offers offset based timezones. It should offer timezones like "Europe/Prague", instead, because in summer it is UTC+2 and in the winter UTC+1. Also UTC is the same as GMT.
Using offsets will cause invalid future and past times when crossing daylight saving or when something other changes.
Adding daylight checkbox is not enough and will cause additional troubles. Just use names and store them as ENUM in database, not offset. This problem is pretty complicated and the only solution is to use names and let libraries to solve it for you.
Thank you.
|
|
2568 | Documentation | Bug Report | Medium | [MANUAL] a missing image in "Understanding Permissions:... | Unconfirmed | |
| | | 01.09.2019 | 02.09.2019 |
Task Description
In the page http://www.flyspray.org/manual/group_permissions/ , it is written
Shown is an image of the permissions page for the Flyspray project’s Contributors group
but there is no image in there.
I can think of two ways of dealing with that I guess:
add an image
remove the sentence
What do you think?
|